Gary DeWaal’s Bridging the Week: September 30 to October 4, and October 7, 2013 (Compliance Officers, SEFs and AIF Reporting)

In a week punctuated by the beginning of trading on Swap Execution Facilities and the simultaneous shut down of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, other important developments occurred internationally and in the US relevant to all financial service participants. These matters included:

1. Compliance officers are in the cross hairs once again of the UK FCA and the US SEC: UK Compliance Officer sued by the FCA, while the SEC issued a Frequency Asked Questions regarding the potential liability of legal and compliance officers for business persons under a failure to supervise theory (with Valuable Lessons Learned);
2. ADM Investor Services, Inc. was fined by the CFTC for segregation violations (with Valuable Lessons Learned);
3. CFTC issued FAQs related to commodity options;
4. CFTC issued No-Action relief related to SEFs just prior to closing its doors, including to an Australian (but not European) multilateral trading facility offering swaps to US persons;
5. ESMA finalized alternative investment funds’ reporting requirements;
6. EUREX scheduled implementation of its Excessive System Usage Fee and Order to Trade Ratio to discourage High Frequency Trading; and additional articles too.

Gary DeWaal’s Bridging the Week: September 23 to 27 and 30, 2013

Last week, brokers once again learned through enforcement actions against ICAP Europe that failure to maintain a robust supervisory system over their employees can be costly and embarrassing. However, brokers also learned in a NY court decision involving Amaranth Advisors, that the threshold to hold futures commission merchants liable for their clients’ possible manipulative practices is very very high.

This week swap dealers and other users of swaps will learn whether the decision of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission to force trading of certain swaps by US persons onto registered Swap Execution Facilities on October 2 promotes transparency and liquidity, engenders anger and confusion, results in a bit of both, or ends up being postponed at least in part. And, who can keep up with all the last minute flurry of guidance and no action letters?

These and other matters covered this week on Bridging the Week are:

1. Yet another trader was sued by the CFTC after allegedly causing large losses to his employer following efforts to disguise trading losses by making false entries into his employer’s internal bookkeeping system;
2. Industry organizations and participants continued to fight against proposed mandatory top up to customer funds’ requirements and a proposed BIS leverage ratio framework that could materially hurt FCMs and their customers;
3. ESMA considers the application of its rules to transactions between non-EU entities; it will make a proposal to the European Commission by November 15;
4. FINRA offered guidance to Broker Dealers regarding suitability while NFA offered guidance to Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors regarding disclosures;
5. Vision Financial Markets, a US-based FCM, was fined in two separate CFTC actions, one for segregation violations, and one for failure to supervise (in connections with positions limits monitoring);
6. RJ O’Brien, also a US-based FCM, was fined too by the CFTC related to a one day segregation violation; and plenty of other industry developments too.

Gary DeWaal’s Bridging the Week: September 16 to 20 and 23, 2013

During the week of September 16 to 20, 2013, the biggest news was the coordinated enforcement actions by four international regulators against JP Morgan related to its London Whale incident. But what also was big news was that the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission was not among the regulators joining in this coordinated enforcement action — for now. Why?

However, the JP Morgan matter was just the tip of the iceberg in a very hectic week featuring many interesting US litigation developments, new regulatory requirements, regulatory proposals, and an important speech by the CEO of the UK Financial Conduct Authority — all potentially impacting a wide-range of industry participants worldwide. These matters – all covered in this week’s Bridging the Week – include:

1. four regulators sued JP Morgan; why was the CFTC not the fifth;
2. DRW Investments sued the US CFTC to avoid a possible enforcement action;
3. an amended complaint was filed by MF Global Holdings litigation trustee against John Corzine and other principals;
4. the US SEC charged 23 firms (many from the managed money industry) in connection with unlawful short sales related to initial public offerings; simultaneously the SEC issued a Risk Alert;
5. the US CFTC seeks public comment on CME’s proposed new EFRP rules (including banning transitory EFRPs);
6. IBs’, FCMs’, RFEDs’ and certain CTAs’ taping requirement becomes effective December 21;
7. ICE Clear US will require a greater percentage (50%) of clearing member guaranty fund deposit in cash, effective December 31;
8. UK FCA CEO Martin Wheatley gave his view on derivatives’ cross border regulation at last week’s London ISDA conference: why can’t we all just get along (internationally);
9. CTAs’ first quarterly report is due at NFA November 14; and more.

My View: Reflections on the JP Morgan’s Settlements — Human Nature, Internal Controls, and the CFTC’s Broad New Anti-Manipulation Authority

On September 19, 2013, as widely reported in the media, JP Morgan consented to and was assessed fines by four international regulators totaling US $920 Million related to what has been colloquially referred to as the “London Whale” trades during 2012.These trades caused the Bank to suffer losses of US $6.2 Billion.

There is little I can add to the facts of this matter that already are set forth in detail in all the regulatory complaints, especially those of the UK Financial Conduct Authority and US Securities and Exchange Commission; JP Morgan’s own study of this incident issued during January 2013; and the media reports.

However, the reported history of this matter, as well the apparent pendency of an action by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, makes me think of two things:

1. no matter how good they are, all financial services firms remain vulnerable to individual employees doing bad things. Unless a firm’s culture and infrastructure are sufficiently robust, these bad things can go undetected for a period of time causing big losses and profound regulatory expense (not to mention potential private litigation expenses and a loss of reputation harming business too); and

2. new anti-manipulation authority given to the CFTC in 2010 as part of Dodd Frank is very broad, and the way the Commission has implemented this authority through rule adoption is broader still. Industry participants must carefully consider their proprietary trading activities where intent and proof of an artificial price may no longer be required for a successful CFTC manipulation prosecution.

Financial services firms must continue to address these realities and take appropriate actions.

Valuable Lessons Learned: CFTC, UK FCA and CME File Charges and Settle with Proprietary Trading Company and Principal for Spoofing

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the UK Financial Conduct Authority, and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange today announced enforcement actions, settlements, and big fines and disgorgement orders for disrupting trading practices - specifically spoofing — involving various commodity futures traded on the CME and ICE Futures Europe utilizing algorithmic trading. For this news item and valuable lessons learned check out our website.

Valuable Lessons Learned: CFTC Files Long Awaited Enforcement Action related to MF Global Collapse

On 27 June, 2013, the CFTC filed its long awaited complaint related to the October 2011 MF Global collapse, naming MF Global Inc., (the futures commission merchant holding customer accounts)(“MFG”), its parent company, MF Global Holdings Ltd.(“Holdings”), John Corizine, CEO and Chairman of Holdings and CEO of MFG, and Edith O’Brien, Assistant Treasurer and who […]

Valuable Lessons Learned: CFTC Sues ABN AMRO for Segregated and Secured Funds and Net Capital Violations. $1 Million Fine Paid.

Yesterday, the CFTC filed and settled charges against ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC for failing to segregate or secure sufficient customer funds on four occasions from March 2009 through August 2011; for failing to meet minimum net capital requirements as of month-end April 2011; and for not being to able to calculate and generate the […]

Valuable Lessons Learned: CFTC Fines FC Stone $1.5 Million for Failing to Have Adequate Risk Controls

The CFTC today filed charges against and settled with FC Stone for failing to maintain adequate customer credit and concentration risk policies during 2008-2009 that allowed one customer account to sustain a loss of approximately $127 million. The CFTC charged FC Stone under its “failure to supervise” regulation (Rule 166.3), assessed a penalty of $1.5 […]

Valuable Lessons Learned (Email Retention): FINRA Fines 5 ING Firms related to Email Review and Retention Violations

FINRA has fined five ING firms USD 1.2 Million for various email retention and review violations. According to the relevant FINRA Acceptance, Waiver and Consent Order (dated 15 February 2013), at various times from 2005 through 2011, one or more of these entities failed, among other things, to: transfer from an active server to an […]